Recent chatter online has
suggested that young adult novels are a new phenomenon, something “we didn’t
have back when I was young,” as Linda Bernstein writes in the Huffington Post.
She and other writers point to Catcher in the Rye and To Kill a Mockingbird as YA forerunners. I take exception on both counts.
For starters, the J. D. Salinger and Harper
Lee novels were not marketed to and probably not written for teens. That we
read them when we were young is another matter. Back in the Sixties, in high school, we teens
read Salinger surreptitiously (almost as surreptitiously as we read Peyton Place). We read Harper Lee for different reasons: because her book is an
American classic and because we were ready for adult novels. Teenagers aspired to be recognized and treated as adults then and were eager – even impatient! – to
be initiated into adult life. We hungered for independence, in reading as well as in living. This hunger explains why so
many young people in the Sixties lived together in groups or married young -- lingering in parental homes until age 30 for the sake of laundry facilities and
technological luxuries was for later generations, not ours – but that is
another story altogether....
A novel with a young
protagonist is not necessarily a young adult novel. Here's where a lot of confusion seems to come in
nowadays. Maggie Smith’s A Tree Grows
in Brooklyn, for example, opens when Francie is a
very young girl going about the streets of Brooklyn with her little brother,
and the focus is on the girl throughout the novel, rather than on her father, a
singing waiter with an alcohol problem, or her mother, a scrubwoman for the
apartment buildings in which they live (moving to a new one each time Johnny
comes home drunk and causes an embarrassing disturbance). Social and political
change, war, the mysteries of sex and death, are all seen by the reader through
Francie’s eyes as she grows from a child into a young woman. And yet, A Tree
Grows in Brooklyn was not intended or thought of
at the time as a book for girls teen Francie’s age (as she is later in the book). On the contrary. Many adults found episodes in it
“shocking,” or “shockingly frank,” but the publisher noted on the cover of an
early paperback edition that “mature readers” would understand such passages as
necessary in the context of the story.
The plain fact is that most
of us who remain voracious readers today were reading adult novels in our high
school years. It was books we read in junior high that were shelved in the children’s
section of the library and marked in the library as Y rather than J for
“juvenile.” They were the bridge between children’s books and adult fiction. This is still how I think of YA literature, regardless of its content.
So what were the young adult novels of the mid-twentieth century,
books aimed at kids in 6th, 7th, and 8th
grade? What did (or do) you read at that transitional stage of life?
My motivation was probably
mixed, but I remember discovering in junior high, in anticipation of the
driver’s license still four years in my future, Henry Gregor Felsen and a whole
new, exciting world of cars. Books like Hot Rod were written neither for children nor adults. The
content and concerns of Felson’s automotive fiction was definitely aimed at a
YA audience. Today I’m intrigued by a Wikipedia entry that claims Felsen explored “the evils of drugs, sexism and
racism.” Have I forgotten that
much of what I read in seventh grade?
One YA classic that’s been
around since 1953 is The Light in the Forest, by Conrad Richter, in which a
15-year-old white boy who has lived for 11 years as an Indian, adopted by a
great warrior, must return to his birth family and learn white ways. There were, of course, many exciting true life adventure stories and biographies aimed at the junior high audience, but I'm sticking to fiction for now.
For boys and girls, there were heaps of mystery novels, going way
beyond the earlier Nancy Drew and Hardy Boys, and there were also stories of
children growing up in families, with a first book with young children and
sequels with older children as the readers of the original grew older. The two
older children of Elizabeth Enright's The Four Story Mistake thus became teenagers in The Saturdays, with all four venturing out on independent
adventures in the latter book, in much the same way that Anne of Anne of
Green Gables, a much earlier,
turn-of-the-last-century girls’ story, grows to adulthood and begins her own
family in later books in L. M. Montgomery series. Maud Hart Lovelace’s stories
of three little girls in Minneapolis, beginning with Betsy-Tacy, also followed those girls as they grew to college
age, launched themselves in careers, and eventually married. Montgomery's and Lovelace's books were not written in the 1960s, but they were still read then and continue to be popular today.
I’ve saved Sixties girls’
stories for last, because there were so many of them! Here’s a little sample,
with one male protagonist thrown in, a 15-year-old country boy, so plagued all
his life that he’s determined to quit school as soon as he turns 16 (legal quitting at the time). I
still vividly remember certain scenes in The Pink Dress, but not all YA girls’ novels were about popularity
in the suburbs. Another I recall had an immigrant family living in a New York
apartment house. The girl, Magda (?), wore old, unfashionable clothes and spoke
with a strong European accent. (Does anyone recognize the story from my
description? I’d love to read this book again.) Maureen Daly’s story of teenage
love, Seventeenth Summer,
originally published in 1942, because of the protagonist's struggles over propriety and depictions of underage smoking and drinking, is claimed by some
(according to a Wikipedia contributor) to have kicked off the YA phenomenon –
but I’ve already argued that it began longer ago. Then there are the ones that
came later, such as the books of Mildred D. Taylor; because she wasn’t publishing until the 1970s, I was an adult before I
discovered her work.
Death was not unknown to YA
novels of the Sixties. We had books whose main characters were orphans and foster children and immigrant kids and kids struggling with physical handicaps, serious illness, and minority status. Poverty or reverses of fortune made appearances, too. I wish I had a list of all the books I read between the ages of 11 and 14, but really, it almost seems the phrase ‘problem fiction’ is redundant, doesn’t it?
I mean, where is the story unless the main character faces a serious challenge
or conflict? Isn’t junior high itself an enormous and difficult challenge?
One theme very important in
decades leading up to the Sixties and through that decade that doesn’t seem as
strong today is that of young people striving for financial independence. First
jobs were landmarks in life and occasions of great pride. Perhaps the absence
of focus on wage-earning in today’s YA literature is the other side of the
dystopic coin, a despair seeming to dictate that only larger-than-life
characters can rise above as they take on global forces of evil. Or maybe it’s
as simple as economic reality, with the current YA audience realizing it will
never achieve the material abundance of its grandparents.
(One mother told me there was
no point in college kids working part-time jobs any more, since they would
still not be able to afford daily lattes. Lattes? What happened to vending
machine instant? That’s what we drank in our dorm late at night! Ah, yes, and
my “poor grandfather,” as he told me with a big fake sigh and a twinkle in his
eye, “had to ride a pony to school!” I’d sure have chosen a pony over a daily
caffe latte, but that’s just me, I guess.)
I wonder. Adolescence has
always been a difficult time of life. The transition from childhood to
adulthood is confusing -- no less confusing as teenagers begin to realize that
adults are often confused, too, and we all need heroic characters once in a
while. Dystopic novels, though, paint an awfully grim and unappealing picture
of “adult” life. If it’s that bad,
what can one do other than rebel? And after rebellion, then what? Wading full-tilt into adult ambiguity, dealing
with well-meaning individuals who disagree on means to an end, sorting out the
well-meaning from the deceptively self-serving – this is the reality that awaits young people with the
courage to engage with the world as it is. It sure isn’t easy – but then, it
never has been, for anyone, at any time in history.
YA novels can be so
compellingly written that they find a large adult audience, in addition to
younger readers. Some are realistic, others fantastic. Can they be divided into
escape and thought-provoking along the same lines? Probably not.
Do you read new YA fiction?
What are your favorites? Or if you’re older, what were your favorites when you
were a preteen and/or young teen?
Whatever your age, from ten to 100, the good news for my readers is that a new YA novel by Ellen Airgood, The Education of Ivy Blake, a sequel to her delightful Prairie Evers, is due for release in early June 2015. Chances look good, too, for a bookstore visit from our favorite U.P. author, so if you haven't read Prairie yet, do that this winter to increase your anticipation for Ivy, a worthy successor.
Whatever your age, from ten to 100, the good news for my readers is that a new YA novel by Ellen Airgood, The Education of Ivy Blake, a sequel to her delightful Prairie Evers, is due for release in early June 2015. Chances look good, too, for a bookstore visit from our favorite U.P. author, so if you haven't read Prairie yet, do that this winter to increase your anticipation for Ivy, a worthy successor.
10 comments:
Did anyone read the Cherry Ames series in their early teens?
Oh, my, yes! My next-younger sister devoured them! And that's another whole sub-genre: mid-20th-century YA novels featuring nurses or nurse's aides.
What a great post, Pamela! A lovely trip down memory lane. Should we add Les Miserables and A Tale of Two Cities and Great Expectations to the list of YA novels?! They were surely assigned in my high school English classes and were life changers for me.
What an interesting topic! It's really made me reminisce about what I read during my junior high years. I also loved the Cherry Ames series that Yvonne mentioned. Besides A Light in the Forest, which you mentioned, two other titles stand out for me: Call it Courage and Call of the Wild. I remember reading those during my young teen years and, incidentally, they remained popular when I taught junior high English.
I really wasn't thinking about classic adult novels here. I certainly wasn't reading Dickens in junior high myself! My bookselling experience tells me that books with teen characters begin to appeal to 10- and 11-year-olds, so YA fiction will often be read as early as 6th grade. In high school, in the old days, we usually left that behind. Nowadays, with the line blurring more and more between YA and adult, especially in the fantasy genre, and with more adults reading YA lit, it's a different scenario. Although I can still remember my grandfather reading my copy of THE BLACK STALLION'S FILLY, becoming so lost in the story that beads of sweat popped out on his forehead!
What a wonderful post! Takes me back to whole days spent reading with one leg over a chair arm. Many of those books loved in late childhood are still on my shelf. Master Skylark, by John Bennett, about a young boy singing the parts of women in Shakespeare's England, Gene Stratton Porter's novels of the Limberlost in Indiana, horse books, dog books, especially Alfred Ollivant's immortal Bob Son of Battle, Melville and Thomas Wolfe, Dickens and Kipling and Maugham, and then the bounty of Sherwood Anderson, Welty, and the whole world of the American short story...
I don't think very many of these books would be easily shelved now as fantasy, children's, teen, YA or New Adult. Many of them were sentimental by today's standards, but who's more sentimental than an adolescent?
Having never been on sabbatical, but experiencing numerous vacations, I was a bit curious about the difference. There is
one source
that suggests the sabbatical is more purposeful, albeit IMO, more worklike. So I hope you consider
taking a 'vacatibbatical'!
BB, you must have been catching up on several posts, as this comment clearly replies to my last post of December. As for the term 'sabbatical,' I used it very intentionally. Thanks for the link to that site differentiating 'sabbatical' from 'vacation.' You noted, I'm sure, that sabbaticals can (often do) involve travel, and everyone I know who's traveled on sabbatical has combined the pleasures of travel with the work (also pleasurable) of research and writing. My goals for this winter are very much of the sabbatical order: focus on creativity, productive work, and rejuvenation. And I'll have to answer to the boss, you know -- ME -- and she (I) can be very demanding!
Pamela,
Glad to read that you, David and Sarah were not part of the devastating pileup in southern Michigan. Your trip sounds great so far. Sarah looks humiliated.
I used to take a blanket for my short-haired dachshunds. I was relatively certain that your route did not include the area of the pileup in I-94 but I kept looking for your vehicle on the TV news.
Hi, Susan! It's a bit disorienting to read a new comment, hit "publish" so it will appear, and then realize it's appearing on an older post rather than a recent one. The photo of Sarah's "humiliation," for instance, does not appear on this page but on a later one. I don't care! I'm just glad to see a comment from you! And yes, we were happy not to be in that horrendous pile-up, too. We would have missed it, anyway, as it was east of 131, but by holing up for three nights in Hastings we escaped the worst blizzard driving -- after our first day that is.
Post a Comment