Infinite Jest
by David Foster Wallace
Orig. pub. 1996
You can go to any number of
sites (e.g., here) for a synopsis of the novel and list of its various characters and plot
lines, and I have no interest in coming up with my own poor replication of what
has been done so many times before. It may be helpful to look up one of those
synopses first, if you are the kind of reader who needs the whole map in front
of you. The thing is, when you pick up the book and open it to begin reading
the novel you don’t get a map, and David Foster Wallace did not list his dramatis
personae before launching into his
narrative. You enter the world, that’s all. You, the reader, are immediately
plunged into the novel’s world
without a map, and only gradually do you begin to put together the map for
yourself.
The narrative does not so
much jump as it steps carefully from one seemingly unrelated story line to
another, and it is difficult to say when the various strands begin to be
loosely braided together. The world of the novel is, after all, a single world,
sometime slightly to the future of the time in which it was written, a world
recognizable to readers in the year of its publication as it continues to be
recognizable today, even though many of its more bizarre aspects have failed
(so far?) to materialize. And so, there is the novel’s world, and here is that
world’s omniscient narrator, checking in first on one set of characters, then
another, moving effortlessly through space from Tucson to Boston as only
fiction allows, and the reader follows the shifts more and more easily as the
novel progresses.
One way to conceptualize the
different story lines is to think of each as a separate musical composition.
All of them, we are sure, as we read along, will eventually come together into
a single work, although for hundreds of pages we need to keep track of separate
orchestras on separate stages, and we cannot help but marvel at the author’s
ability to compose and orchestrate such complexity. Then we notice – was it
there all along? – a subtle, nearly inaudible background line connecting the
various orchestra’s themes, not yet doing anything so overt as tying
together the different story lines, but underlying
them all the same. Onstage in one developing scenario a character thinks he
hears a door hinge squeaking. It’s a familiar sound, characteristic of that
particular door. Too late he realizes the rhythmic, mass quality of the
squeaking, caused by a phalanx of wheelchairs “moving with the indifference of
things at the very top of the food-chain.” It is a group of the legless
French-Canadian terrorists, coming to look for the master copy of the “Entertainment” film cartridge, the novel’s unholy grail. The terrorists
approach like “the devil’s own hamsters, moving with placid squeaks just beyond
view,” and soon a scene of unbelievable violence and carnage ensues.
Cut to the waiting room of
the headmaster of the Enfield Tennis Academy, where a student called in for
discipline notes the squeak of a waiting room chair.
Another cut or two, and an
unidentified first-person narrator (not the main omniscient narrator to whom we
are accustomed) is telling the story of his father demanding assistance in
tearing apart the parental bed to locate a squeak that is driving him mad. The
dismantling and moving of bed parts proceeds in excruciating detail, but before
the problem is located the first-person narrator escapes upstairs to his own
bedroom and jumps onto his narrow twin bed in an attempt to produce a squeak.
But all this as I have described
it foregrounds the squeaking theme, whereas, the way it plays out in the pages of the novel you almost
don’t notice it, and when you start
to be aware you can’t be sure if it’s at all important. Or could it be the
brilliant, masterful author simply adding a bit of fun, for himself, to the
novel’s more serious work? And perhaps there are other background or low-level
connecting themes that have escaped me? Because this one very minor theme I
have identified is surely much less worthy of note than hundreds of other feats
performed by DWF. I only note it as an example of the subtlety of the work, an
indication of how very much is going on.
Much more noteworthy and so
obvious that no reader can miss them are the occasional showstopper pieces, if
you will, where all hell suddenly breaks loose in one of the story lines. At
the Enfield Tennis Academy, for instance, there is a sequence involving
students engaged in their favorite, unbelievably complicated, intellectual and
physical extracurricular game, “Eschaton,” and a similar explosion of
high-speed action in a crowd scene is later set just outside Ennet House, a
halfway house for recovering addicts. In each of these instances, the buildup
to the scene’s explosion proceeds slowly and deliberately, the minutiae of
detail lulling the reader’s suspicions that anything big might happen. “The
night is cold and glycerine-clear and quite still.” Then the “ruckus” begins,
but even then , as the character Gately is observing the scene, himself
becoming cool and clear, “All this appraisal’s taking only seconds; it only
takes time to list it.” And list it the author does, all the simultaneous
action in the scene, as well as the high-speed sequences, and what would take
seconds in a movie takes pages in the book, because writer and reader both need
time to assemble mentally and block and keep track of every move made.
(Confession: I did much
better following the Ennet House “ruckus” than I did the Eschaton game run
amok.)
Certain descriptive phrases,
whether they occur in long, lyrical paragraphs or jump out unexpectedly between
lines of dialogue or out of a scene of mayhem brimming with loathesome, decadent, scatalogical detail, make me catch my breath, as Wallace strings together impressions
and words that have never before been joined, and the result is exquisite.
The urban lume makes the urban night only semidark, as in licoricey, a luminescence just under the skin of the dark, and swelling.
Like that. Luscious.
Here’s the thing. I tried to
read Infinite Jest once before and
didn’t get very far, but since the author’s father was on my dissertation
committee and I was his teaching assistant for two courses, and since I have
read DWF’s short stories and essays with appreciation and admiration and
enjoyment, I really wanted to read the novel, and so I began again this fall.
It was heavy going at first. Although I did not find it as daunting as on the
first attempt, and while some of those lyrical sentences and phrases rewarded
me along the way, at first I did approach my morning or evening reading in the
spirit of duty. And, it must be said, so much of the novel’s atmosphere is
depressing, adding to the feeling of duty.
Only about page 500 did a
shift occur for me. About then the various plots began to flow more easily in
my brain, as if only then had I truly
entered into the author’s world. And following on the heels of the ease came a
slowing-down. I stopped compulsively glancing down at page numbers as I turned
pages. The overall map of the novel’s action, the various stages and characters
– all had their places, and any urgency I had felt earlier to get through the book vanished. I’m in no hurry now. Infinite
Jest is a parallel universe to the
one I inhabit at home, to my bookshop world, and to the world of my own modest
novel-in-progress, whose characters often visit me at unexpected moments,
besides the late night or wee morning hours when I invite them into my mind.
I told my David some of the Infinite
Jest story and read him a few bits
from the book, and he was intrigued, commenting, “It’s a real luxury to get
lost in a long book.” Indeed. I said, “What will I do when I finish it?” But
there is really no danger. Beside me on a corner of the table is Proust, and on
shelves in the living room are Jane Austen and James Joyce, and re-reading
favorite books, revisiting fictional worlds, has been a pleasure of mine for as
many years as I have been a reader, devouring over and over again Alice in
Wonderland, The Black Stallion, The Silver Nutmeg, The Borrowers, and so many other magical stories.
2 comments:
I, too, aborted my first attempt to read IJ early on. Thanks for this-I don't think I've the stamina for the 500 pages right now, but I may try it again sometime.
Many years ago (memorably, 1987) I got a fortune in a Chinese cookie that I've never forgotten: "Your path is arduous but will be amply rewarded." That about sums up how I feel about reading INFINITE JEST. I've passed through the arduous stage and am reaping the rewards.
Post a Comment