My photographs do not do
justice to the color we saw in the U.P. last week. It was the most and best
fall color we’ve ever had north of the Bridge. For one thing, we went up later
than usual, but even so, people who live there year-round were saying it was an
unusually beautiful autumn.
Some of the color was subtle,
and some was spectacular. We were viewing a lot of it in the rain, however, which does make a difference.
Much of the spectacular
color, too, we saw along the highway. I’d see something, but then by the
time we stopped that particular view was gone, so it was only in an old
stumpfield, logged over and burned over long ago, that I finally had time to
wander on foot, so many of my scenes of U.P. fall color are miniature in scope,
small Arctic landscapes. Bracken, blueberries, reindeer moss, and a few ankle-high seedling trees.
And then came a moment that
meant a lot to me, and I cannot begin to explain why. Two years ago I’d
stumbled upon a bearing tree, and this year, by diligent searching, I managed
to re-find it. It is only a stump among acres and square miles of stumps, but
it was once a tree, and the tag on it is a unique place identifier, and the serendipity that first led me to it has endeared it to memory.
When we were planning our
drive from Grand Marais to Marquette on H58, I told David I wanted to look
again this year for the “witness tree.” Why my mind came up with that name, I
don’t know. Technically, a witness tree and a bearing tree are not the same
thing, and as I understand it (assuming I do), a witness tree is identified in
cases where a bearing tree cannot be marked. Mine is a bearing tree. But
witness tree? I love the poetry of names in general and that name, in particular.
1 comment:
Such lovely fall color images, Pamela. And your story about the bearing and witness trees was interesting and enlightening. I'd not heard either term before. Karen
Post a Comment